EBHC Library > Methodology of Research > Clinical Research > Misconducts and Frauds

Page last update: 24/01/2012

Bibliographic Resources	Web Resources
Books Monographs Journals Newsletters Series of Articles Articles	Databases Organizations Projects Tools Directories

• Lock S, Wells F.  Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research. 3rd ed. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2001

• General

  • Kondro W, Hebert PC. Research misconduct? What misconduct? CMAJ 2007;176:905.
  • Young C, Godlee F. Managing suspected research misconduct. BMJ 2007;334:378-9.
  • Marcovitch H. Research misconduct: Can Australia learn from the UK's stuttering system? Med J Aust 2006;185:616-8.
  • Nylenna M, Horton R. Research misconduct: learning the lessons. Lancet 2006;368:1856.
  • Chalmers I. Role of systematic reviews in detecting plagiarism: case of Asim Kurjak. BMJ 2006;333:594-6.
    • Roig M. Ethical writing should be taught. BMJ 2006;333:596-7.

  • Gerber P. What can we learn from the Hwang and Sudbo affairs? Med J Aust 2006;184:632-5.

    • Marusic A, Marusic M. Killing the messenger: should scientific journals be responsible for policing scientific fraud? Med J Aust 2006;184:596-7

  • Nylenna M, Simonsen S. Scientific misconduct: a new approach to prevention. Lancet 2006;367:1882-4

  • Van Der Weyden MB. Preventing and processing research misconduct: a new Australian code for responsible research. It all depends on compliance. Med J Aust 2006;184:430-1.

  • Sox HC, Rennie D. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:609-13.

  • [No authors listed] Are journals doing enough to prevent fraudulent publication? CMAJ 2006;174:431.
  • Snyder EY, Loring JF. Beyond fraud--stem-cell research continues. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:321-4.
  • [No authors listed]. Writing a new ending for a story of scientific fraud. Lancet 2006;367:1.
  • Smith R. Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author. BMJ 2005;331:288-91.
  • White C. Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth. BMJ 2005;331:281-8.
  • Al-Marzouki S, Evans S, Marshall T, et al. Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials. BMJ 2005;331:267-70.
    • Smith J, Godlee F. Investigating allegations of scientific misconduct. BMJ 2005;331:245-6.
  • Godlee F. Dealing with editorial misconduct. BMJ 2004;329:1301-2.
  • Jacobs A. Time for the ghosts to take on physical form. Lancet 2004;364:487-8
  • Van Der Weyden MB. Managing allegations of scientific misconduct and fraud: lessons from the "Hall affair". Med J Aust 2004;180:149-51
  • Mello MM, Brennan TA. Due process in investigations of research misconduct. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1280-6.
  • Smith R. Editorial misconduct. BMJ 2003;326:1224-5.
  • Smith R. Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record. BMJ 2001;323:588.
  • Rennie SC, Crosby JR. Are "tomorrow's doctors" honest? Questionnaire study exploring medical students' attitudes and reported behaviour on academic misconduct. BMJ 2001;322:274-5.
  • Hey E, Chalmers I. Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process. BMJ 2000;321:752-5
    • Griffiths R, Stacey TE, Struthers J. Response from members of the Griffiths inquiry. BMJ 2000;321:755-6.
    • Smith R. Inquiring into inquiries. BMJ 2000;321:715-6.
  • [No authors listed]. Towards a global partnership to prevent misconduct. Lancet 2000;356:351.
  • Farthing M, Horton R, Smith R. Research misconduct: Britain's failure to act. BMJ 2000;321:1485-6
  • Nylenna M, Andersen D, Dahlquist G, et al on behalf  National Committees on Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries. Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries. Lancet 1999;354:57-61
    • Horton R. Scientific misconduct: exaggerated fear but still real and requiring a proportionate response. Lancet 1999;354:7-8
  • Farthing MJ. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud. Lancet 1998;352(Suppl 4):SIV11
  • Rennie D, Evans I, Farthing MJ, et al. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. BMJ 1998;316:1726-1733
    • Smith R. The need for a national body for research misconduct BMJ 1998;316:1686-1687
  • Korenman SG, Berk R, Wenger NS, et al. Evaluation of the research norms of scientists and administrators responsible for academic research integrity. JAMA 1998;279:41-7
    • Youngner JS. The scientific misconduct process: a scientist's view from the inside. JAMA 1998;279:62-4
  • Smith R. Research misconduct: how should editors respond? BMJ 1997:315;201-202
  • Horton R. Will the UK cope? Lancet 1997;350:234
  • Smith R. Time to face up to research misconduct. BMJ 1996;312:789-90
  • Evered D, Lazar P. Misconduct in medical research. Lancet 1995;345:1161-2.
  • Lowry F. Create culture of integrity to defeat research fraud, funding agencies say. CMAJ 1995;152:1507-8.
  • Robinson A. Science and scandal: what can be done about scientific misconduct? CMAJ 1994;151:831-4.
  • Dingell JD. Shattuck Lecture--misconduct in medical research. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1610-5
    • Kassirer JP. The frustrations of scientific misconduct. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1634-6

• Office of Research Integrity  (USA)
• COPE - Commitee on Publication Ethics (UK)

• Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty (D)