EBHC Library > EBHC & CG > HTA > Articles

Page last update: 08/01/2008

	General
	Methodological Reviews from NHS R&D HTA Programme
	Case Study: the NICE
	New Technologies in Medicine Global Theme Issue, November 1999

• Maynard A. Transparency in health technology assessments. BMJ 2007;334:594-5.

• Buschemeyer WC 3rd, Cunningham DK, Edwards MJ. Surgical training and implementation of emerging surgical technologies. Am J Surg 2005;190:166-72 [abstract]

• Tatsioni A, Zarin DA, Aronson N, et al. Challenges in systematic reviews of diagnostic technologies. Ann Intern Med 2005;142(12 Pt 2):1048-55

• Bodenheimer T. High and rising health care costs. Part 2: technologic innovation. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:932-7

• Sunshine JH, Applegate KE. Technology assessment for radiologists. Radiology 2004;230:309-14

• Douw K, Vondeling H, Eskildsen D, et al. Use of the internet in scanning the horizon for new and emerging health technologies: a survey of agencies involved in horizon scanning. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2003:5:e6

• Banta D. The development of health technology assessment. Health Policy 2003;63:121-132. [abstract]

• Hailey D. Toward transparency in health technology assessment: a checklist for HTA reports. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003;19:1-7

• Moher D, Schachter HM. Potential solutions to the problem of conducting systematic reviews of new health technologies. CMAJ 2002;166:1674-5.

• Gibson JL, Martin DK, Singer PA. Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: a transdisciplinary study. BMC Health Serv Res 2002 Jul 18;2:14

• Hunink MG, Krestin GP. Study design for concurrent development, assessment, and implementation of new diagnostic imaging technology. Radiology 2002;222:604-14 [abstract]

• Jarvik JG. Study design for the new millennium: changing how we perform research and practice medicine. Radiology 2002;222:593-4

• Singer PA, Martin DK, Giacomini M, Purdy L. Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: qualitative case study. BMJ 2000;321:1316-8

• Mark DH, Glass RM. Impact of new technologies in medicine: a global theme issue. JAMA 1999;282:1875.

• Perry S, Thamer M. Medical innovation and the critical role of health technology assessment JAMA 1999;282:1869-1872.

• Eisenberg JM. Ten lessons for evidence-based technology assessment.  JAMA 1999;282:1865-1869.

• Jonsson E, Banta D. Management of health technologies: an international view. BMJ 1999;319:1293

• Rosen R, Gabbay J. Linking health technology assessment to practice. Interview by Abi Berger. BMJ 1999;319:1292

• Stevens A, Milne R, Lilford R, Gabbay J. Keeping pace with new technologies: systems needed to identify and evaluate them  BMJ 1999;319:1291

• Kroker P. The problem of remaining upright  BMJ 1999;319:1300

• Donald A. Political economy of technology transfer  BMJ 1999;319:1298

• Wilson BC. The impact of medical technologies on the future of hospitals BMJ 1999;319:1287

• Berger A, Smith R. New technologies in medicine and medical journals. BMJ 1999;319:0

• Flegel KM. Does the physical examination have a future? CMAJ 1999;161:1117-8

• [No authors listed] Technology: wow! (for us) CMAJ 1999;161:1093

• Battista RN,  Hodge MJ. The evolving paradigm of health technology assessment: reflections for the millennium. CMAJ 1999;160:1464-7

• Reeves B. Planning surgical care: Health-technology assessment in surgery. Lancet 1999; 353 (suppl I): 3-5

• Spiegelhalter DJ, Myles JP, Jones DR, Abrams KR.  Methods in health service research. An introduction to bayesian methods in health technology assessment. BMJ 1999;319:508-12

• Holohan TV. The federal role in health technology assessment. Lancet 1996;348:1006-7.

• Naylor CD, Williams JI, Basinski A, et al. Technology assessment and cost-effectiveness analysis: misguided guidelines? CMAJ 1993;148:921-4.

• Diamond GA, Denton TA. Alternative perspectives on the biased foundations of medical technology assessment. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:455-64

• Huston P. Is health technology assessment medicine's rising star? CMAJ 1992;147:1839-41

• Battista RN. Health care technology assessment: linking science and policy-making. CMAJ 1992;146:461-2.

• Guyatt GH, Tugwell PX, Feeny DH, et al. A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies. CMAJ 1986;134:587-94.

• Lowe CU. The consensus development programme: technology assessment at the National Institute of Health. Br Med J 1980;280:1583-4.

• Fineberg HV, Hiatt HH. Evaluation of medical practices. The case for technology assessment. N Engl J Med 1979;301:1086-91 [abstract]

Methodological Reviews  from NHS R&D HTA Programme

• Dundar Y, Dodd S, Dickson R, et al. Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies. Health Technol Assess 2006;10:1-145.

• Dalziel K, Round A, Stein K, et al. Do the findings of case series studies vary significantly according to methodological characteristics? Health Technol Assess 2005;9:1-146.  

• Raftery J, Roderick P, Stevens A. Potential use of routine databases in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess 2005;9:1-106

• Song FJ, Fry-Smith A, Davenport C, et al. Identification and assessment of ongoing trials in health technology assessment reviews. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:1-87.

• Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, et al. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:1-158.

• Claxton K, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, et al. A pilot study on the use of decision theory and value of information analysis as part of the NHS Health Technology Assessment programme. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:1-103.

• Royle P, Waugh N. Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system. Health Technol Assess 2003;7:1-51.

• Williams JG, Cheung WY, Cohen DR, et al. Can randomised trials rely on existing electronic data? A feasibility study to explore the value of routine data in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess 2003;7:1-130

• Townsend J, Buxton M, Harper G. Prioritisation of health technology assessment. The PATHS model: methods and case studies. Health Technol Assess 2003;7:1-82

• Lilford RJ, Richardson A, Stevens A, et al. Issues in methodological research: perspectives from researchers and commissioners. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5:1-57.

• Ramsay CR, Grant AM, Wallace SA, et al. Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies. Health Technol Assess 2001;5:1-79

• Spiegelhalter DJ, Myles JP, Jones DR, et al. Bayesian methods in health technology assessment: a review. Health Technol Assess 2000;4:1-130

• White SJ, Ashby D, Brown PJ. An introduction to statistical methods for health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess 2000;4:1-59

• Robert G, Stevens A, Gabbay J. 'Early warning systems' for identifying new healthcare technologies. Health Technol Assess 1999;3:1-108.

• Billingham LJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR. Methods for the analysis of quality-of-life and survival data in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess 1999;3:1-152

• Johnston K, Buxton MJ, Jones DR, et al. Assessing the costs of healthcare technologies in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1999;3:1-76

• Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, et al. Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 1998;2:1-274

• Mowatt G, Bower DJ, Brebner JA, et al. When and how to assess fast-changing technologies: a comparative study of medical applications of four generic technologies. Health Technol Assess 1997;1:1-149

Case Study: the NICE

• Raftery J. Review of NICE's recommendations, 1999-2005. BMJ 2006;332:1266-8.

• Ferner RE, McDowell SE. How NICE may be outflanked. BMJ 2006;332:1268-71

• Michaels JA. Improving NICE's social value judgments. BMJ 2006;332:48-50.

• Pearson SD, Rawlins MD. Quality, innovation, and value for money: NICE and the British National Health Service. JAMA 2005;294:2618-22

• Littlejohns P, Kelly M. The changing face of NICE: the same but different. Lancet 2005;366:791-4

• Rawlins MD. 5 NICE years. Lancet 2005;365:904-8

• Miners AH, Garau M, Fidan D, et al. Comparing estimates of cost effectiveness submitted to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) by different organisations: retrospective study. BMJ 2005;330:65

• Freemantle N. Is NICE delivering the goods? BMJ 2004;329:1003-4

• Sheldon TA, Cullum N, Dawson D, et al. What's the evidence that NICE guidance has been implemented? Results from a national evaluation using time series analysis, audit of patients' notes, and interviews. BMJ 2004;329:999

• Rawlins MD. NICE work-providing guidance to the British National Health Service. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1383-5

• Maynard A, Bloor K, Freemantle N. Challenges for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. BMJ 2004;329:227-9.

• Rawlins MD, Culyer AJ. National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments. BMJ 2004;329:224-7

• Ryan J, Piercy J, James P. Assessment of NICE guidance on two surgical procedures. Lancet 2004;363:1525-6

• Wailoo A, Roberts J, Brazier J, McCabe C. Efficiency, equity, and NICE clinical guidelines. BMJ 2004;328:536-7

• Burls A, Sandercock J. How to make a compelling submission to NICE: tips for sponsoring organisations. BMJ 2003;327:1446-8

• Devlin N, Parkin D, Gold M. WHO evaluates NICE. BMJ 2003;327:1061-2

• Bloor K, Freemantle N, Khadjesari Z, Maynard A. Impact of NICE guidance on laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernias: analysis of interrupted time series. BMJ 2003;326:578.

• Claxton K, Sculpher M, Drummond M. A rational framework for decision making by the National Institute For Clinical Excellence (NICE). Lancet 2002;360:711-5

• Motson RW. Why does NICE not recommend laparoscopic herniorraphy? BMJ 2002;324:1092-1094

• Dent T, Sadler M. From guidance to practice: Why NICE is not enough. BMJ 2002;324: 842-845

• Raftery J. NICE: faster access to modern treatments? Analysis of guidance on health technologies. BMJ 2001;323:1300-3

• Cookson, R., McDaid, D., Maynard, A. Wrong SIGN, NICE mess: is national guidance distorting allocation of resources?. BMJ 2001;323:743-5

• Sculpher M, Drummond M, O'Brien B. Effectiveness, efficiency, and NICE. BMJ 2001;322:943-944

• Smith R. The failings of NICE. BMJ 2000;321:1363-4

• Smith R. NICE: a panacea for the NHS? BMJ 1999;318:823-4

• A nasty start for NICE. Lancet 1999;354:1313

• Horton R. NICE: a step forward in the quality of NHS care. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. National Health Service. Lancet 1999;353:1028-9

• Dean M. UK ministers seek NICE new health efficiencies. National Institute for Clinical Effectiveness. Lancet 1998;352:1607

New Technologies in Medicine Global Theme Issue, November 1999

• New technologies in medicine and medical journals. BMJ 1999;319

• New Technologies in Medicine. JAMA 1999;282:795

• New Technologies in Medicine. CMAJ 1999;161

• New Technologies in Medicine. MJA 1999;171

Web partners
Centro Studi EBN