Conoscere EBM
- Definizione
- Acronimi
- Cronologia
- Ambiti
- Know-how e strumenti
- EBM in 4 step
- Limiti e ostacoli

EB Practice
- Formulazione quesito
- Ricerca evidenze
- Valutazione evidenze
- Applicazione evidenze

EBHC Library
- Risorse in italiano

SSN Hot Topics
- Appropriatezza
- Conflitti di interesse
- ECM
- Farmaci
- Governo Clinico
- LEA

InfoSanità

Archivio > News 2003

Page last update: 08/01/2008

• BMJ, 3 gennaio

  • Open access publishing takes off

  • Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

  • Commentary: The quality of randomised controlled trials may be better than assumed

  • Assessing the quality of research

• Lancet, 3 gennaio

  • The Lancet's policy on conflicts of interest--2004

  

• Lancet, 20 dicembre

  • Innovation and placebos in research: a new design of clinical trial

• Lancet, 13 dicembre

  • Does informed consent to research require comprehension?

• BMJ, 20 dicembre

  • Christmas issue

• BMJ, 13 dicembre

  • Monitoring the medical education revolution

  • Learning in Practice. Can gynaecology teaching associates provide high quality effective training for medical students in the United Kingdom? Comparative study

  • What the educators are saying

  • Rethinking prescribing in the United States

• BMJ, 6 dicembre

  • Health services research

  • Online first

  • Quality improvement report.Introducing criteria based audit into Ugandan maternity units

  • Increasing the impact of health services research

• Ann Intern Med, 16 dicembre

  • Peer Review: Integral to Science and Indispensable to Annals

• CMAJ, 9 dicembre

  • How to read clinical journals: XI. Everything you always wanted to know about editorials (but were afraid to ask)

• JAMA, 3 dicembre

  • Discussion of Medical Errors in Morbidity and Mortality Conferences

  • The Rational Clinical Examination. Does This Patient Have Pulmonary Embolism?

• Ann Intern Med, 2 dicembre

  • The Discrepancy between Observational Studies and Randomized Trials of Menopausal Hormone Therapy: Did Expectations Shape Experience?

• Bandolier, ottobre 2003

17-30 novembre

• BMJ, 29 novembre

  • Using socioeconomic evidence in clinical practice guidelines

• Lancet, 29 novembre

  • The statin wars

•  

• N Engl J Med, 27 novembre

  • Surgeon Volume and Operative Mortality in the United States

  • The Volume–Outcome Conundrum

• CMAJ, 25 novembre

  • Obituary: the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care

  • Gaps in the evaluation and monitoring of new pharmaceuticals: proposal for a different approach

  • Why don't we initiate more large simple randomized controlled trials?

• Lancet, 22 novembre

  • European Council waters down European Parliament's drug-regulatory legislation

• BMJ, 22 novembre

  • Monitoring drug treatment

  • Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review

  • Joining the DoTS: new approach to classifying adverse drug reactions

• Bandolier, settembre 2003

• MJA, 17 novembre

  • Public funding of large-scale clinical trials in Australia

  

• BMJ, 15 novembre

  • Measuring the health of nations: analysis of mortality amenable to health care

  • Quality improvement report. Booking patients for hospital admissions: evaluation of a pilot programme for day cases

  • Making consent patient centred

  • Communicating risks at the population level: application of population impact numbers

• Lancet, 15 novembre

  • Evidence-based health policy: three generations of reform in Mexico

• CMAJ, 11 novembre

  • Dismantling the Helsinki Declaration

  • The trials and tribulations of doing drug research in children

  

• III Congresso Nazionale AME (Associazione Medici Endocrinologi)

  • Workshop clinici interattivi

• BMJ, 8 novembre

  • WHO evaluates NICE

  • Launching BMJ Learning

  • Cochrane launches global consultation on drug company sponsorship

  • Number of published systematic reviews and global burden of disease: database analysis

  • Randomised controlled trial of clinical decision support tools to improve learning of evidence based medicine in medical students

• Lancet, 8 novembre

  • 21st-century biomedical journals: failures and futures

  • Open access to peer-reviewed research: making it happen

  • Open-access publishing: where is the value?

• N Engl J Med, 6 novembre

  • Clinical Research and the NIH — A Report Card

• Ann Intern Med, 4 novembre

  • ALLHAT, or the Soft Science of the Secondary End Point

• CIRB - Coordinamento per l'Integrità della Ricerca Biomedica

  • Il resoconto della 2a riunione

• BMJ, 1 novembre

  • Improving clinical research

  • Descriptive survey of non-commercial randomised controlled trials in the United Kingdom, 1980-2002

  • Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery

  • Resuscitating clinical research in the United Kingdom

  

• Lancet, 25 ottobre

  • The statin wars: why AstraZeneca must retreat

  • Tackling socioeconomic inequalities in health: analysis of European experiences

  • Doctor performance and public accountability

• N Engl J Med, 23 ottobre

  • Population-Based Studies of Adverse Drug Effects

  

• BMJ, 18 ottobre

  • When to retract?

  • Cochrane at crossroads over drug company sponsorship

• Lancet, 18 ottobre

  • The need for research in primary care

• BMJ, 11 ottobre

  • Numero monografico: From compliance to concordance

• Arch Intern Med, 13 ottobre

  • Are Gifts From Pharmaceutical Companies Ethically Problematic?: A Survey of Physicians

• Lancet, 11 ottobre

  • Translating research into practice--a three-paper series

  • From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care

  

• Lancet, 4 ottobre

  • Physical examination in the care of medical inpatients: an observational study

• CMAJ, 30 settembre

  • Are all evidence-based practices alike? Problems in the ranking of evidence

  • Letters, numbers, symbols and words: how to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations

  • As one journal ends open-access policy, a new one embraces it

• BMJ, 27 settembre

  • Theme Issue: Communicating risks: illusion or truth?

• JAMA, 24 settembre

  • Practical Clinical Trials: Increasing the Value of Clinical Research for Decision Making in Clinical and Health Policy

  • The Rational of Clinical Examination. Does This Child Have Acute Otitis Media?

• Arch Intern Med, 22 settembre

  • Pharmacists on Rounding Teams Reduce Preventable Adverse Drug Events in Hospital General Medicine Units

• Bandolier, agosto 2003

15-22 settembre

• JAMA, 17 settembre

  • Retrospective Drug Utilization Review, Prescribing Errors, and Clinical Outcomes

• Ann Intern Med, 16 settembre

  • Standardized Reporting of Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Proposal from the Conference on Guideline Standardization

• CMAJ, 16 settembre

  • The medical office of the 21st century (MOXXI): effectiveness of computerized decision-making support in reducing inappropriate prescribing in primary care

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research budgetary dilemma: unprecedented growth and program reductions

• MJA, 15 settembre

  • The medical emergency team, evidence-based medicine and ethics

  

• JAMA, 10 settembre 2003

  • Effect of Awareness of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Use of Experimental Therapy

• BMJ, 6 settembre

  • The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions—challenges for doctors

  • Reforming clinical research and development in England

  • United Kingdom research governance strategy

  • Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

• CMAJ, 2 settembre

  • How does direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) affect prescribing? A survey in primary care environments with and without legal DTCA

  • Supported by an unrestricted educational grant

  • Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising in Canada: Permission by default?

  

• BMJ, 30 agosto

  • Conducting clinical trials over the internet: feasibility study

• N Engl J Med, 28 agosto

  • Shattuck Lecture: Clinical Research to Clinical Practice — Lost in Translation?

• JAMA, 27 agosto

  • Methodological Differences in Clinical Trials Evaluating Nonpharmacological and Pharmacological Treatments of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis

  • Ethics of Phase 1 Oncology Studies: Reexamining the Arguments and Data

  

• JAMA, 20 agosto

  • Association of Funding and Conclusions in Randomized Drug Trials: A Reflection of Treatment Effect or Adverse Events?

• BMJ, 16 agosto

  • Self reports in research with non-English speakers

  • Appraisal: the catalyst of personal development

• N Engl J Med

  •  Trial Design and Patient Safety — The Debate Continues

• Arch Intern Med, 11 agosto

  • Clinicians' Responses to Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Prescription Medications

  • Quality Assessment of a Collaborative Approach for Decreasing Drug-Related Morbidity and Achieving Therapeutic Goals

  

• BMJ, 9 agosto

  • From electronic gadgets to better health: where is the knowledge?

  • Rate limiting factors in recruitment of patients to clinical trials in cancer research: descriptive study

  • Learning in practice. Involving patients in medical education

• CMAJ, 5 agosto

  • New grades for recommendations from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care

• BMJ, 2 agosto

  • Clinical trials for tomorrow funded by the MRC

  • Paying for bmj.com

  • Quality improvement report. Improving compliance with requirements on junior doctors' hours

  • What happened to the valid POEMs? A survey of review articles on the treatment of type 2 diabetes

  • Commentary: The faults of expert reviews are already well known

• BMC Med Res Methodol, 31 luglio

  • Does anybody read "evidence-based" articles?

• Arch Intern Med, 28 luglio

  • What Is the Price of Life and Why Doesn't It Increase at the Rate of Inflation?

  • "Inappropriate" Treatment Near the End of Life: Conflict Between Religious Convictions and Clinical Judgment

  

• Lancet, 26 luglio

  • What price competitiveness in the drugs industry?

• JAMA, 23 luglio

  • Factors Associated With Failure to Publish Large Randomized Trials Presented at an Oncology Meeting

  • Registering Clinical Trials

• CMAJ, 22 luglio

  • Unwanted results: the ethics of controversial research

• BMC Health Serv Res, 21 luglio

  • A philosophical analysis of the evidence-based medicine debate

• MJA, 21 luglio

  • Trials On Trial. Baseline data in clinical trials

• Lancet, 19 luglio

  • Clinical trials, genetic add-ons, and the question of benefit-sharing

• Bandolier, giugno 2003

7-13 luglio

• BMJ, 12 luglio

  • Balancing benefits and harms in health care

• JAMA, 9 luglio

  • A Social Science Perspective on Gifts to Physicians From Industry

• CMAJ, 8 luglio

  • A randomized controlled trial of a pharmacist consultation program for family physicians and their elderly patients

  • Why most interventions to improve physician prescribing do not seem to work

  

• BMJ, 5 luglio

  • The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect

  • Strategy for randomised clinical trials in rare cancers

• JAMA, 2 luglio

  • Use of Continuous Quality Improvement to Increase Use of Process Measures in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

• Ann Intern Med, 1 luglio

  • Computer Physician Order Entry: Benefits, Costs, and Issues

  • The Rise of Litigation in Human Subjects Research

  • Minimizing Risk in Clinical Research

  

• BMJ 28 giugno

  • Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence

• N Engl J Med, 26 giugno

  • The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United States

  • Improving the Quality of Care — Can We Practice What We Preach?

• CMAJ, 24 giugno

  • Scientific publishing picks up speed

• Arch Intern Med, 23 giugno

  • Effects of Computerized Physician Order Entry and Clinical Decision Support Systems on Medication Safety: A Systematic Review

  • Oversight of Quality Improvement: Focusing on Benefits and Risks

• BMJ 21 giugno

  • Anecdotes as evidence

• N Engl J Med, 19 giugno

  • Patient Safety: Improving Safety with Information Technology   

  • Errors Today and Errors Tomorrow

• Ann Intern Med, 17 giugno

  • Error, Blame, and the Law in Health Care—An Antipodean Perspective

  • Improving Patient Care

  • Patient Safety and the Reliability of Health Care Systems

• BMJ 14 giugno

  • The Patient issue

    • Should drug companies be allowed to talk directly to patients?: YES

    • Should drug companies be allowed to talk directly to patients?: NO

    • Do patients need to read research?

• N Engl J Med, 12 giugno

  • Clinical Trials and Rare Diseases

• JAMA, 11 giugno

  • Incremental Treatment Costs in National Cancer Institute–Sponsored Clinical Trials

• BMJ 7 giugno

  • Editorial misconduct

  • Representation of South Asian people in randomised clinical trials: analysis of trials' data

  • Pitfalls of editorial miscommunication

  • Quality improvement report. Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia at a community based contraceptive service for young people

  • VOMIT (victims of modern imaging technology)—an acronym for our times

  

• Bandolier, maggio 2003

• Ann Intern Med, 3 giugno

  • Applying Evidence to Patient Care: From Black and White to Shades of Grey

• Med J Aust, 2 giugno

  • Epitaph for the EBM in action series

  • Recruitment to randomised studies

  

• BMJ, 31 maggio

  • Theme issue. Time to untangle doctors from drug companies

    • No more free lunches

    • Information from drug companies and opinion leaders

    • Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review

    • Evidence b(i)ased medicine—selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications

    • Characteristics of general practitioners who frequently see drug industry representatives: national cross sectional study

    • Who pays for the pizza? Redefining the relationships between doctors and drug companies. 1: Entanglement 

    • Who pays for the pizza? Redefining the relationships between doctors and drug companies. 2: Disentanglement 

    • How to dance with porcupines: rules and guidelines on doctors' relations with drug companies 

    • How can research ethics committees protect patients better? 

    • Medical journals and pharmaceutical companies: uneasy bedfellows

    • Unhealthy spin 

    • Relationships between the pharmaceutical industry and patients' organisations

• JAMA, 28 maggio

  • Use of Race and Ethnicity in Biomedical Publication

• Arch Intern Med, 26 maggio

  • Two Collaborating Artists Produce a Work of Art The Medical Interview

  • "Building" a History Rather Than "Taking" One A Perspective on Information Sharing During the Medical Interview

  • Tracking the Uptake of Evidence

  

• JAMA, 21 maggio

  • Analysis and Reporting of Factorial Trials: A Systematic Review

  • Composite Outcomes in Randomized Trials: Greater Precision But With Greater Uncertainty?

  • Clinical Trials—Multiple Treatments, Multiple End Points, and Multiple Lessons

• Ann Intern Med, 20 maggio

  • Medical Professionalism in the New Millennium: A Physician Charter 15 Months Later

  • The Charter on Medical Professionalism and the Limits of Medical Power

  

• Bandolier, aprile 2003

  • Mindstretcher - Checking out systematic reviews

  • Mindstretcher - does unpublished information make a difference?

• Report eventi GIMBE^â

  • Evidence-based Medicine: le opportunità di un linguaggio comune

• CMAJ, 13 maggio

  • Getting it right: industry sponsorship and medical research

  

• BMJ, 3 maggio

  • Scientific literature's open sesame?

  • Ethics of clinical trials from a bayesian and decision analytic perspective: whose equipoise is it anyway?

• Lancet, 26 aprile

  • FDA: untapped source of unpublished trials

• BMJ, 26 aprile

  • Failures of the therapeutic chain as a cause of drug ineffectiveness

  • ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Creating teaching materials

  • Inappropriately delayed discharge from hospital: What do we know?

• JAMA, 23 aprile

  • Stopping Medical Research to Save Money: A Broken Pact With Researchers and Patients

  

• Effective Health Care

  • Inhaler devices for the management of asthma and COPD

• BMJ, 19 aprile

  • Evaluating computerised health information systems: hard lessons still to be learnt

  • ABC of learning and teaching: Web based learning

  • Improving the quality of health care: Methods for incorporating patients' views in health care

• Lancet, 19 aprile

  • Improving the performance of health services: the role of clinical leadership

• N Engl J Med, 17 aprile

  • Patient Safety: Adverse Drug Events in Ambulatory Care

  • Adverse Outpatient Drug Events — A Problem and an Opportunity

• JAMA, 16 aprile

  • Disseminating Innovations in Health Care

• Ann Intern Med, 15 aprile

  • Multivariable Analysis: A Primer for Readers of Medical Research

  • Clinical Research and the Physician–Patient Relationship

  

• BMJ, 12 aprile

  • Learning in practice. Effect of ethnicity on performance in a final objective structured clinical examination: qualitative and quantitative study

  • ABC of learning and teaching: Educational environment

  • Improving the quality of health care: Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care

• JAMA, 9 aprile

  • Drug-Drug Interactions Among Elderly Patients Hospitalized for Drug Toxicity

• MJA, 7 aprile

  • Clinical trials research in the new millennium: the International Clinical Trials Symposium, Sydney, 21–23 October 2002

  • Flow of participants in randomised studies

• Bandolier, marzo 2003

17 marzo - 6 aprile

• BMJ, 5 aprile

  • Setting global health research priorities

  • ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Work based assessment

  • Why certain systematic reviews reach uncertain conclusions

  • Improving the quality of health care: Using research to inform quality programmes

• N Engl J Med, 3 aprile

  • Controlling Research Trials

  • The Therapeutic Orientation to Clinical Trials

  • The Integral Role of Clinical Research in Clinical Care

  • Research Involving Cognitively Impaired Adults

• JAMA, 2 aprile

  • Drug-Drug Interactions Among Elderly Patients Hospitalized for Drug Toxicity

• Lancet, 5 aprile

  • Misguided at the Medical Research Council

• BMJ, 29 marzo

  • Connecting doctors, patients, and the evidence

  • Extracts from "Best Treatments": Treating generalised anxiety disorder • Commentary: Putting research into practice • Commentary: A patient's story of living with anxiety • Commentary: Information for patients receiving cognitive therapy

  • ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Skill based assessment

  • Setting up an outcomes guarantee for pharmaceuticals: new approach to risk sharing in primary care

• BMJ, 22 marzo

  • Doctor-manager relationships can be improved

  • ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Written assessment

• Lancet, 22 marzo

  • Under-reporting of clinical trials is unethical

  • Role of a research ethics committee in follow-up and publication of results

• CMAJ, 18 marzo

  • Technology-enabled knowledge translation: building a framework for collaboration

  

• Aggiornamento sito GIMBE^â: nuova sezione

  • Aree Specialistiche

    • Evidence-based surgery

• Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore. Newsletter Va' Pensiero

  • Formare alla EBM, l'EBM per formare

• BMJ, 15 marzo

  • Fifth international congress on peer review and biomedical publication

  • Impact of NICE guidance on laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernias: analysis of interrupted time series

  • ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Learning and teaching in the clinical environment

  • Evidence b(i)ased medicine

• JAMA, 12 marzo

  • Central Challenges Facing the National Clinical Research Enterprise

  • Translating Biomedical Research to the Bedside A National Crisis and a Call to Action

  

• Aggiornamento sito GIMBE^â: nuova pagina

  • Educazione Continua in Medicina

• L'Educazione Continua in Medicina Una guida per medici, operatori e dirigenti della sanità. Roma: Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore, 2003

  • La formazione residenziale degli operatori sanitari: dalla prove di efficacia all'organizzazione degli eventi 

• BMJ, 8 marzo

  • Disclosure of financial competing interests in randomised controlled trials: cross sectional review

  • ABC of learning and teaching in medicine. One to one teaching and feedback

  • Medical students' application of published evidence: randomised trial

• Bandolier, febbraio 2003

• JAMA, 5 marzo

  • Incidence and Preventability of Adverse Drug Events Among Older Persons in the Ambulatory Setting

  • Medication Safety Moving From Illusion to Reality

• Med J Aust, 3 marzo

  • Computerised reminders and feedback in medication management: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

  

• BMJ, 1 marzo

  • Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses

  • Research pointers: Survey of claims of no effect in abstracts of Cochrane reviews

  • Quality improvement report. Achieving national service framework standards for cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention

  • ABC of learning and teaching in medicine. Teaching small groups

• Lancet 1 marzo

  • Medical journals: evidence of bias against the diseases of poverty

• N Engl J Med, 27 febbraio

  • Patient Safety: Residents' Suggestions for Reducing Errors in Teaching Hospitals

• JAMA, 26 febbraio

  • Patients' and Physicians' Attitudes Regarding the Disclosure of Medical Errors

• BMJ, 22 febbraio

  • Fewer new drugs from the pharmaceutical industry

  • Learning in practice. Pilot study of the roles of personality, references, and personal statements in relation to performance over the five years of a medical degree • Commentary: How to derive causes from correlations in educational studies

  • ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Teaching large groups

• Lancet, 22 febbraio

  • Light and shade in proposed revision of EU drug-regulatory legislation

  • Are large clinical trials in rapidly lethal diseases usually unethical?

• JAMA, 19 febbraio

  • Medical Monitoring for Pharmaceutical Injuries Tort Law for the Public's Health?

  • The Rational Clinical Examination. Is This Woman Perimenopausal?

• CMAJ, 18 febbraio

  • Cost–utility analysis: Use QALYs only with great caution

• MJA, 17 febbraio

  • Statistical methods in clinical trials

• BMJ 15 febbraio

  • Safety and efficacy of interventional procedures

  • ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Evaluation

  • Indiscriminate investigations have adverse effects

• JAMA, 12 febbraio

  • Restoring Balance to Industry-Academia Relationships in an Era of Institutional Financial Conflicts of Interest Promoting Research While Maintaining Trust

  

• BMJ, 8 febbraio

  • Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care

  • Validation of the Fresno test of competence in evidence based medicine

  • ABC of learning and teaching in medicine. Problem based learning

• CMAJ, 4 febbraio

  • Toward effective Canadian public–private partnerships in health research

• Bandolier, gennaio 2003

  • Calculating and using NNT

  

• BMJ, 1 febbraio

  • Closing the digital divide

  • ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Curriculum design

  

• BMJ, 25 gennaio

  • NHS waiting lists and evidence of national or local failure: analysis of health service data

  • Ten ways to improve information technology in the NHS • Commentary: improve the quality of the consultation • Commentary: Clinical focus might make it work

  • ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Applying educational theory in practice

• Lancet, 25 gennaio

  • Another loss in the privatisation war: PubScience

• JAMA, 22-29 gennaio

  • External Incentives, Information Technology, and Organized Processes to Improve Health Care Quality for Patients With Chronic Diseases

  • Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research A Systematic Review

• N Engl J Med, 16 gennaio

  • Patient Safety: Risk Factors for Retained Instruments and Sponges after Surgery

  • Ensuring Safe and Effective Medical Devices

• BMJ, 18 gennaio

  • Transferability of principles of evidence based medicine to improve educational quality: systematic review and case study of an online course in primary health care

• JAMA, 15 gennaio

  • The Rational of Clinical Examination. Does This Patient Have Parkinson Disease?

  

• Eventi GIMBE^â 2003

  • Conferenze Internazionali

    • 2nd International Conference for Evidence-based Teachers and Developers 

  • Workshop nazionali

    • Workshop Evdience-based Medicine

    • Decisioni cliniche e Prove di Efficacia. 2^a ed

  • Corsi di formazione

    • Corso avanzato "Evidence-based Nursing" 3^a ed

    • Evidence-based Pneumology 3a ed.

    • 4^th Advanced Summer Course in Evidence-based Medicine

    • Corso avanzato "Evidence-based Nursing" 4^a ed

• Sito GIMBE^â

  • Interamente aggiornate le pagine sulle linee guida

    • Linee guida (searching)

    • Linee guida (electronic-library)

• Bandolier, dicembre 2002

• BMJ, 4 gennaio

  • Using clinical databases in practice

  • Reporting diagnostic tests

  • Evidence based policy making

  • How to evaluate and improve the quality and credibility of an outcomes database: validation and feedback study on the UK Cardiac Surgery Experience

  • Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative

• Lancet, 4 gennaio

  • Accuracy of pharmaceutical advertisements in medical journals

  • The Lancet's policy on conflicts of interest

  • Adverts in medical journals: caveat lector

  • The hidden alternative: getting investigational treatments off-study

• JAMA, 1 gennaio

  • The Rational of Clinical Examination. Does This Patient Have Acute Cholecystitis?

  • Improving Reports of Studies of Diagnostic Tests The STARD Initiative